The Continuing Saga of Prince Chunk and All of That Other Stuff

October 11, 2008 by admin  
Filed under ANIMAL NEWS, Adoption Issues

I was flagged on September 2, 2008 by fellow web blogger Chris, of Take Care of your Cats, regarding updated information on what I thought was a happy ending for dear Prince Chunk. Turns out I was wrong.

According to an August 28, 2008 article by The Associated Press the adoption paperwork is now held up due to legal wrangling and contract analyzing. Chunk’s new family the Damianis of New Jersey were ready to settle into a routine life with their new family member— until they were informed by the Camden County Shelter that the adoption agreement they signed was invalid.

Prince chunk awaits his permanent home.

Prince chunk awaits his permanent home. Hopefully it will be one with a lot of square-footage.

Jennifer Andersch, Executive Director of the Camden County Shelter, stated that due to the nature of Prince Chunk’s notoriety both parties agreed to have an adoption agreement drawn up by legal counsel. Part of that agreement would mandate that Chunk make fund-raising appearances on behalf of the shelter.

For the Damiani family the surprise of the “invalid” adoption agreement was even more confounding when a letter they received from the shelter labeled them as Chunk’s “foster” family. This bit of news spurred the Damiani family to take their story public.

What I find interesting about the Camden Animal Shelter is a little tidbit of information located on the internet regarding the shelter’s past history. It appears that the Camden County Animal Shelter has been in the spotlight before. At least on a local level.

In 1997 this shelter, located in Blackwood, New Jersey, was operated by a group that went under the name, Humane Society of Southern New Jersey. The director was Glenn McCleery and the organization itself was headed by Richard Perr, Esq. of Tineman, Krektsein & Harris, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania who headed the shelter from its inception.

In 2002 the shelter was charged by the New Jersey SPCA for illegally providing shelter animals for experimentation, a practice known a “pound seizure.” Veterinary students from the local Camden college were provided with these animals to “practice” on. The college would order a certain number of animals of specific size, weight and species. The shelter would “fulfill” the order by slating these animals for euthanasia (regardless of the animal’s health condition or its adoptability).

“As reported in Compassion for Camden’s Winter 2002 UPDATE, in April and August of last year the Humane Society of Southern NJ (humane society) allowed a number of animals to be removed from the Camden County Animal Shelter to be used by Sound Technologies as test subjects for hands-on equipment training and sales. The company-sponsored seminars stretched over a period of days at the Cherry Hill Clarion Hotel.”

The practice was uncovered by Marion Churchill, founder and president of Compassion for Camden. It was then reported to the New Jersey SPCA who in turn conducted is own investigation*.

On July 24, 2004 the NJ SPCA formerly filed suit in Camden County Superior Court charging the management of the Camden County Animal Shelter, the Humane Society of Southern New Jersey, the Camden County College, shelter director Glenn McCleery, college staffer Maragaret Dorsey and various others with animal cruelty - the use of shelter animals for experimentation - a crime of the fouth degree. (read more..)

Thankfully as of September 1, 2004, Perr and the Humane Society of Southern New Jersey were no longer involved with the Camden County Animal Shelter. The Animal Welfare Society took over the operation of the shelter that same day.

According to Marion Churchill, when the shelter was under the direction of the Humane Society of Southern New Jersey, 60% of dogs and 80% of cats were killed. She states that the shelter’s inaccessible operating hours were partly responsible, since it was only open one evening a week and closed on Sundays and holidays. She continues to state that no other shelter in the state had such a poor record. Yet, when she approached Richard Perr about these sad numbers his email response was,”….the shelter continues to be one of the premier facilities in the state…” Marion Churchill concludes, “Frankly, I don’t know what ever prompted Perr to use the word ‘continues’ because I don’t recall the shelter to ever be ‘premier’.”

This news never reached those of us who live in other areas of the country but I am certain that locals were stunned and horrified when evidence was revealed that an organization containing the word “humane” turned out to be inhumane. And although the shelter’s current management has a wonderful record of decreasing euthanasia and increasing adoptions, its past may not be completely forgotten. This might explain why people like the Damiani family are suspicious about the shelter’s motives regarding Prince Chunk.

Indeed, Prince Chunk has proved to be quite a windfall for the county shelter placing it in the public spotlight—this time on a national level. From the shelter’s perspective Chunk provides the perfect opportunity to educate and enlighten people about the plight of homeless pets. Furthermore, his touching story may help the shelter receive much needed revenue in the form of donations. Certainly that is as it should be. Shelters are donation motivated and it’s not uncommon for them to capitalize on free publicity.

However, a humane shelter’s primary focus is to place its healthy pet population with loving families. To withhold an animal from receiving a permanent home due to its “fame” is not exactly within the interest of the animal. And this type of action places the shelter’s needs, and the “greater good” of other animals, above that of Prince Chunk. The Damianis need to know that this cat is indeed going to remain Prince of their home. And Chunk needs to become a permanent member of a family who obviously has his best interest at heart.

[*A hard copy of the report, including names of witnesses, is available to the
public via the Open Public Records Request Application (OPRA).]

Contact Camden County Administration 856-225-5354
http://www.state.nj.us/dep/opra/forminfo.html
County Administration 856-225-5354 mlonetto@camdencounty.com

Staying home alone isn't always a party for your pet! But with SecurePet, you'll be sure your babies are safe and sound, in the comfort of their own home ...
















Welcome to the SecurePet.biz web site and blog!

Find out more about SecurePet pet sitting within the pages of this site and learn how your animals can be well taken care of the next time you are away from home for business or pleasure. At long last, leaving pets at home has never been more hassle-free!

This is your local service ... one that is provided to you personally by me, Gyvel Young, the principal owner and sitter for SecurePet (please learn more about my pet sitter qualifications here).

What service areas do I cover? SecurePet covers the Wimberley, Texas area (and other select areas within Hays County such as Blanco, Driftwood, and more) and provides sitter services to conscientious pet owners who need their animals tended to when they are away. What's the best part? Your animals get to stay in the comfort of their own home!

Contacting SecurePet is simple. Just follow the link to my online pet sitter contact form and send me a message about you and your animals. I will respond to your pet sitting request by phone or email in less than 24 hours.

Once your needs are determined, I will visit with you in person to meet you and your pets, prior to the actual pet sitting assignment. At that time, the needs of your pets will be assessed and the scope of the services you require defined.

I look forward to hearing from you and taking care of all your pet-sitting needs in the Texas Hill Country area. Until then, feel free to browse my site, check my rates, and meet some of the wonderful animals that I have taken care of as a pet sitter. And, be sure to take a look at my informative and fun articles and learn all about the wonderful animals we call pets ...

—Gyvel

Comments

2 Responses to “The Continuing Saga of Prince Chunk and All of That Other Stuff”

  1. admin on October 18th, 2008 11:31 am

    This is a great story

  2. Jim on October 18th, 2008 11:33 am

    Wow, I really like this blog!

Have a bark, purr, chirp, howl, or growl? Please leave your comments here: